To What Extent Are Democracy and Dictatorship Different?

To what conclusion argon res publica and absolutism una resembling? In order to answer this hesitancy we essential first examine the generic wine basis of both democracy and magisterialism separately. The border democracy originates from the classicals, and is defined as rule of the community coming from the language demos ( good deal) and kratos ( designer). It was coined around 400 BCE, to denote the political placements and soly existing in Greek city-states, notably Athens. Commonly, two forms of democracy ar recognised, these be direct democracy and example democracy.Direct democracy was customd in Athenian democracy, and is a system in which people vote on policy initiatives directly. many US states and Switzerland still use this system often. Representative democracy refers to the system which is in place in Britain today. It is a variation of democracy founded on the principle of choose people representing a group of people. The term dictatorship is de fined as an imperative form of judicature in which the brass is rules by an exclusive. For whatsoever scholars, a dictatorship is a form of g overnment that has queen to govern without consent of those being governed.As is the reason with democracy, there argon different kinds of dictatorship. An authoritarian dictatorship is genius kind whereby the power the govern is held by a modest group of elite politicians. A compress dictatorship is a form of political science wherein the political power resides with the military. We plenty get to answer this disbelief by looking at at the way in which administrations argon make in democracy and in dictatorship. We, in Britain live in a democracy whereby every five years we hold in general resource in which everyone over 18 years of age back end vote for who they would resembling to be their local MP.Whichever company wins to a greater extent than 50% of the MPs in the tolerate of Commons end then go on to form a gove rnment. We, hence as citizens of this country, feel handed over our sovereignty and elected the people who entrust go on to govern us for the next five years until we take out sovereignty to hold somewhat other election. We have therefore given the government the right to govern via consent. In a dictatorship however, in many cases the people havent given those in power, the right to be there. Figures such s Lenin, who believed in a dictatorship of the proletariat in Marxist terms, seized power of their government sooner than being elected by the people. In the case of Lenin this was after a revolution and due to the failings of the Provisional Government the Bolsheviks were equal to take advantage of their weaknesses and, through crazy means, take control the the country. However, we must not make the assumption that all dictators have come to power via the means of force and violence. An example of a infamous dictators move up to power without the use of an overthrow of the then government, is Hitler.He was republi provideally elected to become chancellor of Germany, and then used his power in that role to change the laws surrounding the limits on his power, thus securing him as a dictator. From this we can see that the means in which a governments in democracy and dictatorships are formed are different, and can in some situations be the complete opposite of all(prenominal) other. The means in which a government maintains billet in a democracy and in a dictatorship, show one of the many differences mingled with these two forms of governing. Traditionally, in a democracy, a government would use rational and proportional means of policing and punishment.For example, in Britain as a democracy we do not have situations where people are persecuted for expressing their religious views and beliefs. However, across the world, ill-temperedly in the Middle East, there are dictatorships where you may be persecuted for your beliefs, whether they be rel igious, political or cultural. These places have regimes often known as law states, whereby people are always under the surveillance of the authorities, and the government controls the police and whole justice system, making these countries less democratic.Although we can clearly identify stark differences between democracy and dictatorship, there are certain(prenominal) groups of thinkers who believe that the two are truly not as different as it would appear on paper. There are those who follow Karl Marxs thoughts and beliefs that actually democracy, in particular capitalist democracies are simply cautious dictatorships, whereby the middle classes are exploiting the working lasses, who he refers to as the proletariat. There is withal the question of the tyranny of the volume, an spot raised by many philosophers, from Aristotle in Ancient Greece, to Alexis de Tocqueville and Friedrich Nietzsche. This issue envisions a scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests so far above those of an individual or minority group as to make up active oppression, comparable to that of tyrants and despots.In many cases a disliked ethnic, religious or racial group is deliberately penalized by the majority element acting through the democratic process. Thus, from this theory, it can be suggested that there are elements of democracy which actually allow dictatorships amongst groups of people, to be formed. It would nearly certainly be foolish to equate previous Birtish Primeministers like Margeret Thatcher to notorious dictators such as prexy monoamine oxidase or Adolf Hitler, but we must also consider the theory of an nonappointive dictatoship.It would most certainly be unwise to compare previous British prime ministers like Margaret Thatcher to notorious dictators such as Chairman Mao or Adolf Hitler, but we must also consider the theory of an elective dictatorship This term coined by gentle Hailsham refers to the way in which some governmen ts can be dominated, or dictated by the executive body within them, thus making them less democratic as less views of the people are being put forward for law making, instead, a small body of elite politicians are running effectively running the government.This along with a large majority in the House of Commons, such as the 1983 materialistic majority of ___? , means that the MPs in the Commons can no longish fulfil their role of representing their constituents effectively as a dictatorship of the governing party may mean that any law proposed by the executive is very possible to be passed due to the huge majority.On paper, and in theory, democracy and dictatorship may take care worlds apart in their basis of power, how authority is maintained and how government is created, but in actual fact, when taking into account the thoughts of leadership philosophers and academics, we can clearly draw some parallels between these two forms of governing.Elements of one can often be found in the other, although fundamentally the main aims of democracy are often not met in dictatorship. The freedoms and liberties of the individual are often not emphasized in a dictatorship. However, after canvas the different elements of democracies around the world, I dont think it would be dead on target to say that these freedoms and liberties of the people are raze being fulfilled in democracies.