Review The Tennessee Valley Authority And Its Consequences History Essay

Review The Tennessee Valley Authority And Its Consequences History EssayWhen it was effected in 1933, the Tennessee Valley Authority was an extremely controversial organization. As part of Roosevelts New Deal and his first hundred days, in which he initiated many invigorated programs to jump start the nations economy and put people back to work, the TVA was charged with the responsibility of providing electrical energy, improving infrastructure, and enhancing the fiber of life of the deeply depressed people bread and butter in the Tennessee Valley. During the Great printing, those populating this area resided in log cabins, with only the bare essentials needful to survive, and sometimes less. Their objectives of electrifying rural the States came into direct conflict with the laissez-faire(prenominal) ambitions of private expediency companies. Also, in order to accomplish their goals of improving the Tennessee Valleys waterways for transportation meant building decametres a nd man- do lakes, displacing thousands of topical anesthetics who had inhabited the area for hundreds of years. This operation not only refer relocating families to their bare-assed homes, which was met with an exceptional amount of resistance, but exhuming the thousands of graves and reburying them at new sites. However, although the work done by the TVA in this area was sometimes flawed, and despised by many people in which the program aimed to champion, the organization helped to bring modern commodities to a region that had been devastated by the economic crisis of the Great Depression.The Tennessee Valley During the DepressionThe area surrounding the prospective site for Norris Dam had been settled for the past two hundred years and, like more of Americas farm charge further west, the land showed signs of exhaustion by farmers who did not consider the long term effects of over earth. Prior to the Depression, many young men and women from the Tennessee Valley would move apart from the area to their own farms or to new cities of an increasingly industrialized Midwest. However, when tough economic times hit the American people during the Great Depression, many of those who had left field to begin their own lives returned home to the safety and the familiar surroundings of their Tennessee homes. In the years between 1930 and 1935, the Tennessee Valley saw an increase in the areas population, which do keep off what little the land provided even more difficult than before.1Farmers in the Tennessee Valley primarily raised corn for their animals and livestock while raising early(a) crops for personal consumption. Tobacco was also raised to bring in a source of revenue, providing farmers with something they could sell in order to buy things they could not make or grow at home. Farming primarily for ones own personal use, called subsistence farming, was a way of life in the Tennessee Valley which allowed for very few luxuries to the people which lived th ere. The 3500 farming families in the area which would be flooded by the Norris Dam included both property owners and tenant farmers, or farmers who grew cash crops like tobacco on another persons land in exchange for a place to live. Living conditions in the Tennessee Valley were extremely difficult for both of these groups. Even during the most favourable of times, there was not nearly enough money gained by way of topical anaesthetic taxes to provide for adequate man schools, health services, or road construction.2 insane asylum of the Tennessee Valley AuthorityOne of the TVAs primary objectives was to improve infrastructure and the ability to transport goods through the Tennessee Valley through the use of its rivers and other waterways. This was particularly the face with an area of the Tennessee valley known as Muscle Shoals, Alabama, where the Tennessee River falls 140 feet in elevation over almost thirty miles. This dramatic drop in altitude produced the rapids or shoals that the area received its named for, and made it extremely difficult for ships to go through and travel up further the Tennessee River. In 1916 the federal giving medication gained ownership of the region and began drawing up plans to build a dam there. The proposed dam was intended to produce electrical energy which was needed to manufacture explosives for the war effort. However, the primary World War ended before the sites could be completed and utilized. During the next few years, the government debated over what should be done with the area. Some members of Congress argued that the dam should be s octogenarian to private organizations.SenatorGeorge W. Norrisfrom Nebraska, on the other hand, argued that the public should retain control over the area. Norris had attempted several times to initiate bills for the federal schooling of the region. However, they were all defeated by Republican administrations who saw no advantages to retaining the area. With the onset of the Grea t Depression, Americans viewed government economic intervention in the public interest much more favorably. The newly elected President Roosevelt, who had a previous interest in regional planning, conservation, and planning, punted Norris proposal to develop the Tennessee River Valley.3On the 18th of May, 1933 Roosevelt sign(a) the Tennessee Valley Authority Act as part of his first 100 days. The objectives of the TVA was to improve transportation along the Tennessee River, provide methods for flood control, plan reforestation, improve the quality of the poor farm lands, aid in industrial and agricultural organic evolution, and assist in the national defense effort with the development of government owned the Tempter and nitrate manufacturing sites at Muscle Shoals.Although almost ninety percent of those alive in urban areas had electricity by the 1930s, this was only true for ten percent of people living in rural areas. Private electricity companies, who were the primary supp liers of electric causation to the nations consumers, insisted that it would be too expensive to build electric lines to small, set-apart rural farmsteads. They also argued that most farmers would not even be able to afford electricity in the event that they were provided the opportunity.Roosevelt and his administration held the belief that if private electricity companies could not or would not supply electric power to the American people, then it was the responsibility of the federal government to do it. In 1935, the Rural electric automobile Administration was established to electrify to rural areas such as the Tennessee Valley. In his 1935 article Electrifying the Countryside, the head of the REA, Morris Cooke, stated thatThough rural power uses of electricity began thirty-five years ago on an irrigated farm in California, the 1930 Census showed that only one tenth of American farms had central station service. One of the barriers to the development of farm electrification has been the rural line extension policy of many of the utilities. The power company has persisted in regarding the farmer not as a potential power customer, but as a small domestic consumer.4By the start of 1939 the REA had assisted in establishing several hundred rural electric cooperatives, which provided services to about 300,000 homes. Rural households with electricity had risen to twenty-five percent. Furthermore, the acts of the REA motivated private power companies to provide electricity to the countryside as well. When farmers did finally receive electric power, they helped to support local merchants by purchasing electric appliances. As in turned out, farmers generally required more energy than those living in the city, which helped to balance the extra expenses on the part of the electric companies in bringing power lines to the rural areas.The Tennessee Valley Authority established the Electric Home and Farm Authority to assist farmers in purchasing major electric appliance s. The EHFA made special arrangements with appliance manufacturers to provide electric ranges, water heaters, and refrigerators at prices most farmers could afford. The new appliances were sold at local electric cooperatives and utility companies. It was here that a farmer could purchase appliances with loans offered by the EHFA, who provided these loans with low-cost financing.5Electrification of rural land was based on the idea that affordable electricity would help to improve the standard of living and the economic independence of the traditional family farm. But electricity alone was not nearly enough to put a stop the hardships being faced by Americas farm communities. Furthermore, it did not stop the migration of rural farmers from the country to the city, or did the shrinking of the total number of family owned farms. opposer to the TVAThere were many people who opposed the TVA and the federal governments participation in developing electric power in rural areas, in particula r utility companies who thought that the government had an unfair advantage when competing with private companies. Also, some members of the Congress who didnt believe the government should have the right to influence the economy, thought that the TVA was a potentially dangerous program which would bring the United States effective that much closer to socialism.6Others believed that rural farmers did not have the knowledge or skills needed to maintain and support local electric companies.7The most powerful opposition to the Tennessee Valley Authority came from power companies, who found it hard to compete with the cheaper energy provided through the TVA, and they saw it as a danger to private development. They argued that the federal governments participation in the electricity industry was unconstitutional. The attack on the TVA was led by future presidential prospect Wendell Willkie, then president of the large power utility company Commonwealth Southern Company.During the 1930 s, many court cases were brought against the TVA. The Alabama Power Company presented a shell against the TVA that made it all the way to the Supreme coquette. They argued that by entering into the electricity industry, the federal government had surpassed its Constitutional powers. However, there attempts proved unsuccessful. In February of 1936, the Supreme Court came to the decision that the TVA had the right and authority to produce power at Wilson Dam as well as to sell and distribute that electricity. In 1939 the Court again maintained the constitutionality of the Tennessee Valley Authority.8Consequences of the TVAThe TVA was established in part to improve the standard of living in an region which was home to one-third-and-a-half million people. When Norris Dam was constructed, it submerged an office of 239 square acres where about 3,500 families resided. The Act establishing the TVA gave it the authority to exercise the right ofeminent domain, and in the purchase of any real estate or the reproval of real estate by condemnation proceedings, the title to such real estate.9Even though the TVA had been established for the purpose of improving the living conditions of the people living in the Tennessee Valley, the federal government neglected to offer much of any assistance in resettling the displaced families of the Norris washstand. In this area, farm owners were supplied with cash settlements for their property and were given help in the search for a new home. Tenants, who merely worked on the land but did not own it, received no payment at all. The Norris Basin had been home for thousands of families for centuries. Generations of people had been buried there. In addition to relocating all of the areas living population, all of the regions dead had to be exhumed from their graves and reburied in places outback(a) the reach of the lakes created by the Norris dam. For both the farm families and the TVA workers alike, this process was extremely diffi cult.10Some of the families displaced by the Norris Dam benefited from the work of the TVA. Many people saw that their new homes were nicer and more comfortable than their old log cabin ones. Additionally, approximately one out of five had a member of their family who was employed by the TVA. However, sixty percent of the relocated families were relocated to new homes within the Norris Basin, which, even after the efforts of the TVA, continued to be a region prone to the same kind of problems of bad farming conditions and overpopulation and which had been a source of pother from them prior.Similarly to other planned communities developed during FDRs New Deal, the small town of Norris was initially supposed to be a great display for the electrification of rural America and city planning. Many people believed that Norris would be the perfect home for those displaced people from the Norris Basin. However, the construction workers who came to the area in order to build the Norris Dam a lso needed a place to stay. Because of this, Norris originally functioned as temporary housing for the TVA workers and their families, while the residents of the Norris Basin were forced to find other accommodations, often times in areas just as poverty-stricken as where they had come from.11The idea that Norris would become a model American town was a mistaken one from the start. TVA authorities made regulations excluding African-American families from living in the town. They argued that these measures were taken in order to conform to the traditions and customs of the region. However, black leaders were quick to point out that impoverished discolour and black families had lived and worked together in the mountains and valleys of the basin for many years prior to the arrival of the TVA. During the 1930s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People coordinated three separate investigations of Tennessee Valley Authority for racial discrimination in the housing an d hiring of African-Americans.A man named Arthur Morgan, who was very interested in community planning, imagined Norris as a self-sustaining community of people who involved themselves in small, local cooperative industries. Early in the development of Norris, some cooperative businesses were established. These included canneries, creameries, and poultry farms. The communitys public school became a focal point of of community activity. Educational classes were given to children as well as adults, and for the town people themselves and for the farming families from the surrounding communities. However, notwithstanding Morgans ambition and noble goals for the town, living in Norris was operated much like any other company town. The TVA managed almost every aspect of activity in Norris. Everything from the towns float station to its cafeteria was operated by the TVA.12When the dam was finished, the construction workers left Norris. Working professionals who were employed by TVA or in nearby Knoxville saw Norris as a practical(a) alternative to life in the city, and the town slowly transformed into a white collar suburb of Knoxville. As the towns inhabitants became more affluent, and were required to travel to jobs which were outside of Norris, the cooperative organizations and many of the community driven activities diminished. In 1948, the government sold the town to a private corporation, who in turn resold the individual lots to the residents.The TVA made many advancements to the Tennessee Valley in terms of infrastructure, and the quality of life for the majority of the areas residents. This region was one of the hardest hit by the Great Depression. The majority of Americans living in rural areas were living without electricity at the start of the 1930s. Private utility companies were unwilling to spend the money needed to reach these rural communities with their power lines. As part of his attempt to bring the United States out of the Depression and into the modern era, Franklin Roosevelt initiated many new work programs, including the TVA. Unfortunately, these advancements sometimes came with sacrifice for those residents, in particular the displaced families of the Norris Basin. However, without these sacrifices, it whitethorn not have been possible for the people living in Tennessee Valley to improve their living conditions.